[PATCH] D49508: [Sema] Expr::skipRValueSubobjectAdjustments(): record skipped NoOp casts.

[Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

lebedev.ri added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49508#1168584, @rjmccall wrote:

> Hmm.  I think the approach of flagging ICEs that are semantically part of an explicit cast is probably a better representation for tools across the board.


I could do that, but i couldn't find where it should be done.
Where are these "ICEs that are semantically part of an explicit cast" created? Where would we mark them?

> If we *are* going to do it this way, though, I think you should (1) make the collection of skipped expressions optional and (2) collect *all* the skipped expressions, not just no-op casts.

1. I was wondering about that, will do.
2. Well, i could do that, but i would need to filter them afterwards in my use-case. So i wonder - what is the motivation for that? Nothing else needs that additional knowledge right now.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D49508