[PATCH] D36357: Added a better diagnostic when using the delete operator with lambdas
Nicolas Lesser via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 13 02:54:30 PDT 2018
Rakete1111 updated this revision to Diff 155336.
Rakete1111 edited the summary of this revision.
Rakete1111 added a comment.
Addressed review comments.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36357
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td
lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
test/Parser/cxx0x-lambda-expressions.cpp
test/SemaCXX/new-delete-0x.cpp
Index: test/SemaCXX/new-delete-0x.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaCXX/new-delete-0x.cpp
+++ test/SemaCXX/new-delete-0x.cpp
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@
void bad_deletes()
{
// 'delete []' is always array delete, per [expr.delete]p1.
- // FIXME: Give a better diagnostic.
- delete []{ return (int*)0; }(); // expected-error {{expected expression}}
+ delete []{ return (int*)0; }(); // expected-error {{'[]' after delete interpreted as 'delete[]'}}
}
+
Index: test/Parser/cxx0x-lambda-expressions.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Parser/cxx0x-lambda-expressions.cpp
+++ test/Parser/cxx0x-lambda-expressions.cpp
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
void delete_lambda(int *p) {
delete [] p;
delete [] (int*) { new int }; // ok, compound-literal, not lambda
- delete [] { return new int; } (); // expected-error{{expected expression}}
+ delete [] { return new int; } (); // expected-error {{'[]' after delete interpreted as 'delete[]'}}
delete [&] { return new int; } (); // ok, lambda
}
Index: lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
+++ lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
@@ -2942,15 +2942,44 @@
// [Footnote: A lambda expression with a lambda-introducer that consists
// of empty square brackets can follow the delete keyword if
// the lambda expression is enclosed in parentheses.]
- // FIXME: Produce a better diagnostic if the '[]' is unambiguously a
- // lambda-introducer.
- ArrayDelete = true;
- BalancedDelimiterTracker T(*this, tok::l_square);
- T.consumeOpen();
- T.consumeClose();
- if (T.getCloseLocation().isInvalid())
- return ExprError();
+ const Token Next = GetLookAheadToken(2);
+
+ // Basic lookahead to check if we have a lambda expression.
+ if (Next.isOneOf(tok::l_brace, tok::less) ||
+ (Next.is(tok::l_paren) &&
+ GetLookAheadToken(3).isOneOf(tok::r_paren, tok::identifier) &&
+ GetLookAheadToken(4).is(tok::identifier))) {
+ SourceLocation RightBracketLock = NextToken().getLocation();
+ // Warn if the non-capturing lambda isn't surrounded by parenthesis
+ // to disambiguate it from 'delete[]'.
+ ExprResult Lambda = ParseLambdaExpression();
+ if (Lambda.isInvalid())
+ return ExprError();
+
+ SourceLocation StartLoc = Lambda.get()->getLocStart();
+ Diag(Start, diag::err_lambda_after_delete)
+ << SourceRange(Start, RightBracketLock)
+ << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(StartLoc, "(")
+ << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(
+ Lexer::getLocForEndOfToken(Lambda.get()->getLocEnd(), 1,
+ Actions.getSourceManager(),
+ getLangOpts()),
+ ")");
+
+ // Evaluate any postfix expressions used on the lambda.
+ Lambda = ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix(Lambda);
+ return Actions.ActOnCXXDelete(Start, UseGlobal, /*ArrayForm=*/false,
+ Lambda.get());
+ } else {
+ ArrayDelete = true;
+ BalancedDelimiterTracker T(*this, tok::l_square);
+
+ T.consumeOpen();
+ T.consumeClose();
+ if (T.getCloseLocation().isInvalid())
+ return ExprError();
+ }
}
ExprResult Operand(ParseCastExpression(false));
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td
===================================================================
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@
InGroup<CXX98Compat>, DefaultIgnore;
def ext_alignof_expr : ExtWarn<
"%0 applied to an expression is a GNU extension">, InGroup<GNUAlignofExpression>;
+def err_lambda_after_delete : Error<
+ "'[]' after delete interpreted as 'delete[]'">;
def warn_microsoft_dependent_exists : Warning<
"dependent %select{__if_not_exists|__if_exists}0 declarations are ignored">,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D36357.155336.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4086 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20180713/75bc13af/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list