[clang-tools-extra] r334807 - [clangd] Do not report comments that only have special chars.
Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 18 11:53:28 PDT 2018
This test has been failing on Windows since it has been added:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/12549
I took a look at the unittest code, but I'm not familiar enough with this
code to debug it. Can you take a look at this?
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:35 AM Ilya Biryukov via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: ibiryukov
> Date: Fri Jun 15 01:31:17 2018
> New Revision: 334807
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=334807&view=rev
> Log:
> [clangd] Do not report comments that only have special chars.
>
> Summary:
> Like the following:
> // -------
> // =======
> // *******
>
> It does not cover all the cases, but those are definitely not very
> useful.
>
> Reviewers: sammccall, ioeric, hokein
>
> Reviewed By: sammccall
>
> Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48171
>
> Modified:
> clang-tools-extra/trunk/clangd/CodeCompletionStrings.cpp
> clang-tools-extra/trunk/unittests/clangd/CodeCompleteTests.cpp
>
> Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/clangd/CodeCompletionStrings.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/clangd/CodeCompletionStrings.cpp?rev=334807&r1=334806&r2=334807&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- clang-tools-extra/trunk/clangd/CodeCompletionStrings.cpp (original)
> +++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/clangd/CodeCompletionStrings.cpp Fri Jun 15
> 01:31:17 2018
> @@ -151,6 +151,16 @@ bool canRequestComment(const ASTContext
> const ObjCPropertyDecl *PDecl = M ? M->findPropertyDecl() : nullptr;
> return !PDecl || canRequestForDecl(*PDecl);
> }
> +
> +bool LooksLikeDocComment(llvm::StringRef CommentText) {
> + // We don't report comments that only contain "special" chars.
> + // This avoids reporting various delimiters, like:
> + // =================
> + // -----------------
> + // *****************
> + return CommentText.find_first_not_of("/*-= \t\r\n") !=
> llvm::StringRef::npos;
> +}
> +
> } // namespace
>
> std::string getDocComment(const ASTContext &Ctx,
> @@ -167,7 +177,10 @@ std::string getDocComment(const ASTConte
> const RawComment *RC = getCompletionComment(Ctx, Decl);
> if (!RC)
> return "";
> - return RC->getFormattedText(Ctx.getSourceManager(),
> Ctx.getDiagnostics());
> + std::string Doc = RC->getFormattedText(Ctx.getSourceManager(),
> Ctx.getDiagnostics());
> + if (!LooksLikeDocComment(Doc))
> + return "";
> + return Doc;
> }
>
> std::string
> @@ -180,7 +193,10 @@ getParameterDocComment(const ASTContext
> const RawComment *RC = getParameterComment(Ctx, Result, ArgIndex);
> if (!RC)
> return "";
> - return RC->getFormattedText(Ctx.getSourceManager(),
> Ctx.getDiagnostics());
> + std::string Doc = RC->getFormattedText(Ctx.getSourceManager(),
> Ctx.getDiagnostics());
> + if (!LooksLikeDocComment(Doc))
> + return "";
> + return Doc;
> }
>
> void getLabelAndInsertText(const CodeCompletionString &CCS, std::string
> *Label,
>
> Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/unittests/clangd/CodeCompleteTests.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/unittests/clangd/CodeCompleteTests.cpp?rev=334807&r1=334806&r2=334807&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- clang-tools-extra/trunk/unittests/clangd/CodeCompleteTests.cpp
> (original)
> +++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/unittests/clangd/CodeCompleteTests.cpp Fri Jun
> 15 01:31:17 2018
> @@ -1100,6 +1100,65 @@ TEST(CompletionTest, DocumentationFromCh
> Contains(AllOf(Not(IsDocumented()), Named("func"))));
> }
>
> +TEST(CompletionTest, NonDocComments) {
> + MockFSProvider FS;
> + auto FooCpp = testPath("foo.cpp");
> + FS.Files[FooCpp] = "";
> +
> + MockCompilationDatabase CDB;
> + IgnoreDiagnostics DiagConsumer;
> + ClangdServer Server(CDB, FS, DiagConsumer, ClangdServer::optsForTest());
> +
> + Annotations Source(R"cpp(
> + // ------------------
> + int comments_foo();
> +
> + // A comment and a decl are separated by newlines.
> + // Therefore, the comment shouldn't show up as doc comment.
> +
> + int comments_bar();
> +
> + // this comment should be in the results.
> + int comments_baz();
> +
> +
> + template <class T>
> + struct Struct {
> + int comments_qux();
> + int comments_quux();
> + };
> +
> +
> + // This comment should not be there.
> +
> + template <class T>
> + int Struct<T>::comments_qux() {
> + }
> +
> + // This comment **should** be in results.
> + template <class T>
> + int Struct<T>::comments_quux() {
> + int a = comments^;
> + }
> + )cpp");
> + Server.addDocument(FooCpp, Source.code(), WantDiagnostics::Yes);
> + CompletionList Completions = cantFail(runCodeComplete(
> + Server, FooCpp, Source.point(), clangd::CodeCompleteOptions()));
> +
> + // We should not get any of those comments in completion.
> + EXPECT_THAT(
> + Completions.items,
> + UnorderedElementsAre(AllOf(Not(IsDocumented()),
> Named("comments_foo")),
> + AllOf(IsDocumented(), Named("comments_baz")),
> + AllOf(IsDocumented(), Named("comments_quux")),
> + // FIXME(ibiryukov): the following items
> should have
> + // empty documentation, since they are
> separated from
> + // a comment with an empty line.
> Unfortunately, I
> + // couldn't make Sema tests pass if we ignore
> those.
> + AllOf(IsDocumented(), Named("comments_bar")),
> + AllOf(IsDocumented(), Named("comments_qux"))));
> +}
> +
> TEST(CompletionTest, CompleteOnInvalidLine) {
> auto FooCpp = testPath("foo.cpp");
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20180618/5cc92606/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list