[libcxx] r332000 - More notes on Rapperswil issues
Marshall Clow via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 10 10:07:38 PDT 2018
Author: marshall
Date: Thu May 10 10:07:38 2018
New Revision: 332000
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=332000&view=rev
Log:
More notes on Rapperswil issues
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=332000&r1=331999&r2=332000&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Thu May 10 10:07:38 2018
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3076">3076</a></td><td>basic_string CTAD ambiguity</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3079">3079</a></td><td>LWG 2935 forgot to fix the existing_p overloads of create_directory</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3080">3080</a></td><td>Floating point from_chars pattern specification breaks round-tripping</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3083">3083</a></td><td>What should ios::iword(-1) do?</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3083">3083</a></td><td>What should ios::iword(-1) do?</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3094">3094</a></td><td>[time.duration.io]p4 makes surprising claims about encoding</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3100">3100</a></td><td>Unnecessary and confusing "empty span" wording</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3102">3102</a></td><td>Clarify span iterator and const_iterator behavior</td><td>Rapperswil</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -92,17 +92,17 @@
<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
<ul>
<li>2139 - I think that this is just wording cleanup.</li>
-<li>2970 - </li>
-<li>3058 - </li>
+<li>2970 - I think that we already do this - checking with Michael.</li>
+<li>3058 - We don't do the parallel algos yet</li>
<li>3062 - This should be very easy.</li>
<li>3067 - Adding restrictions; no code changes needed.</li>
<li>3071 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
-<li>3074 - </li>
+<li>3074 - Large change, that looks straightforward.</li>
<li>3076 - </li>
-<li>3079 - </li>
-<li>3080 - </li>
-<li>3083 - </li>
-<li>3094 - </li>
+<li>3079 - Eric? </li>
+<li>3080 - We don't have a from_chars implementation yet.</li>
+<li>3083 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
+<li>3094 - We haven't implemented Howard's date library yet.</li>
<li>3100 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
<li>3102 - This should be just adding tests.</li>
<li>3104 - We already do this.</li>
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
<li> 2936 - Eric - don't we do this already?</li>
</ul>
-<p>Last Updated: 7-May-2018</p>
+<p>Last Updated: 10-May-2018</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list