[PATCH] D44203: [clang-format] Improve Incomplete detection for (text) protos
Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 11 02:21:35 PDT 2018
sammccall accepted this revision.
sammccall added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================
Comment at: lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:773
case tok::r_brace:
- // Lines can start with '}'.
- if (Tok->Previous)
+ // Lines can start with '}' except in text protos.
+ if (Tok->Previous || Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_TextProto)
----------------
krasimir wrote:
> sammccall wrote:
> > In what sense of "line" is this true?
> This is the UnwrappedLine concept of clang-format: roughly a maximal sequence of tokens that we could have put on the same line if there was no column limit.
I still don't understand why it's true for say C or JS then.
(kinda relevant here because I would like to understand why proto is an exception)
================
Comment at: unittests/Format/FormatTestProto.cpp:21
class FormatTestProto : public ::testing::Test {
+ enum StatusCheck { SC_ExpectComplete, SC_ExpectIncomplete, SC_DoNotCheck };
+
----------------
DoNotCheck is never used, consider removing it
================
Comment at: unittests/Format/FormatTestProto.cpp:21
class FormatTestProto : public ::testing::Test {
+ enum StatusCheck { SC_ExpectComplete, SC_ExpectIncomplete, SC_DoNotCheck };
+
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> DoNotCheck is never used, consider removing it
(nit: is the SC_ prefix really needed in tests?)
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44203
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list