[PATCH] D44844: [PR36880] Avoid -Wunused-lambda-capture false positive for explicit this capture used in an unresolved member in a generic lambda
Eli Friedman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 23 14:09:45 PDT 2018
efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h:11269
+ // 'this' capture is marked as 'used'.
+ if (Old->isImplicitCXXThisAccess())
+ getSema().CheckCXXThisCapture(Old->getMemberNameInfo().getLoc(),
----------------
This doesn't make sense; in general, you can't tell whether an UnresolvedMemberExpr requires a "this" capture.
```
template<typename T> class C : T {
static int f(int);
int f(double);
public:
int g() {
return []{ return f(T::x); }();
}
};
struct A { static int x; };
void x(C<A> c) { c.g(); }
```
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44844
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list