r327782 - [C++17] Allow an empty expression in an if init statement
Zhihao Yuan via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Mar 17 14:42:10 PDT 2018
Author: lichray
Date: Sat Mar 17 14:42:10 2018
New Revision: 327782
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=327782&view=rev
Log:
[C++17] Allow an empty expression in an if init statement
Summary:
This fixes [PR35381](https://llvm.org/pr35381) and an additional bug where clang didn't warn about the C++17 extension when having an expression in the init statement.
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for contributing the patch.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40445
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/CXX/stmt.stmt/stmt.select/p3.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp?rev=327782&r1=327781&r2=327782&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp Sat Mar 17 14:42:10 2018
@@ -1744,17 +1744,34 @@ Sema::ConditionResult Parser::ParseCXXCo
ParsedAttributesWithRange attrs(AttrFactory);
MaybeParseCXX11Attributes(attrs);
+ const auto WarnOnInit = [this, &CK] {
+ Diag(Tok.getLocation(), getLangOpts().CPlusPlus17
+ ? diag::warn_cxx14_compat_init_statement
+ : diag::ext_init_statement)
+ << (CK == Sema::ConditionKind::Switch);
+ };
+
// Determine what kind of thing we have.
switch (isCXXConditionDeclarationOrInitStatement(InitStmt)) {
case ConditionOrInitStatement::Expression: {
ProhibitAttributes(attrs);
+ // We can have an empty expression here.
+ // if (; true);
+ if (InitStmt && Tok.is(tok::semi)) {
+ WarnOnInit();
+ SourceLocation SemiLoc = ConsumeToken();
+ *InitStmt = Actions.ActOnNullStmt(SemiLoc);
+ return ParseCXXCondition(nullptr, Loc, CK);
+ }
+
// Parse the expression.
ExprResult Expr = ParseExpression(); // expression
if (Expr.isInvalid())
return Sema::ConditionError();
if (InitStmt && Tok.is(tok::semi)) {
+ WarnOnInit();
*InitStmt = Actions.ActOnExprStmt(Expr.get());
ConsumeToken();
return ParseCXXCondition(nullptr, Loc, CK);
@@ -1764,10 +1781,7 @@ Sema::ConditionResult Parser::ParseCXXCo
}
case ConditionOrInitStatement::InitStmtDecl: {
- Diag(Tok.getLocation(), getLangOpts().CPlusPlus17
- ? diag::warn_cxx14_compat_init_statement
- : diag::ext_init_statement)
- << (CK == Sema::ConditionKind::Switch);
+ WarnOnInit();
SourceLocation DeclStart = Tok.getLocation(), DeclEnd;
DeclGroupPtrTy DG =
ParseSimpleDeclaration(DeclaratorContext::InitStmtContext, DeclEnd,
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/stmt.stmt/stmt.select/p3.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CXX/stmt.stmt/stmt.select/p3.cpp?rev=327782&r1=327781&r2=327782&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/stmt.stmt/stmt.select/p3.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/stmt.stmt/stmt.select/p3.cpp Sat Mar 17 14:42:10 2018
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++1z -Wc++14-compat -verify %s -DCPP17
int f();
@@ -10,10 +11,67 @@ void g() {
}
}
-
void h() {
if (int x = f()) // expected-note 2{{previous definition}}
int x; // expected-error{{redefinition of 'x'}}
else
int x; // expected-error{{redefinition of 'x'}}
}
+
+void ifInitStatement() {
+ int Var = 0;
+
+ if (int I = 0; true) {}
+ if (Var + Var; true) {}
+ if (; true) {}
+#ifdef CPP17
+ // expected-warning at -4 {{if initialization statements are incompatible with C++ standards before C++17}}
+ // expected-warning at -4 {{if initialization statements are incompatible with C++ standards before C++17}}
+ // expected-warning at -4 {{if initialization statements are incompatible with C++ standards before C++17}}
+#else
+ // expected-warning at -8 {{'if' initialization statements are a C++17 extension}}
+ // expected-warning at -8 {{'if' initialization statements are a C++17 extension}}
+ // expected-warning at -8 {{'if' initialization statements are a C++17 extension}}
+#endif
+}
+
+void switchInitStatement() {
+ int Var = 0;
+
+ switch (int I = 0; Var) {}
+ switch (Var + Var; Var) {}
+ switch (; Var) {}
+#ifdef CPP17
+ // expected-warning at -4 {{switch initialization statements are incompatible with C++ standards before C++17}}
+ // expected-warning at -4 {{switch initialization statements are incompatible with C++ standards before C++17}}
+ // expected-warning at -4 {{switch initialization statements are incompatible with C++ standards before C++17}}
+#else
+ // expected-warning at -8 {{'switch' initialization statements are a C++17 extension}}
+ // expected-warning at -8 {{'switch' initialization statements are a C++17 extension}}
+ // expected-warning at -8 {{'switch' initialization statements are a C++17 extension}}
+#endif
+}
+
+// TODO: Better diagnostics for while init statements.
+void whileInitStatement() {
+ while (int I = 10; I--); // expected-error {{expected ')'}}
+ // expected-note at -1 {{to match this '('}}
+ // expected-error at -2 {{use of undeclared identifier 'I'}}
+
+ int Var = 10;
+ while (Var + Var; Var--) {} // expected-error {{expected ')'}}
+ // expected-note at -1 {{to match this '('}}
+ // expected-error at -2 {{expected ';' after expression}}
+ // expected-error at -3 {{expected expression}}
+ // expected-warning at -4 {{while loop has empty body}}
+ // expected-note at -5 {{put the semicolon on a separate line to silence this warning}}
+}
+
+// TODO: This is needed because clang can't seem to diagnose invalid syntax after the
+// last loop above. It would be nice to remove this.
+void whileInitStatement2() {
+ while (; false) {} // expected-error {{expected expression}}
+ // expected-warning at -1 {{expression result unused}}
+ // expected-error at -2 {{expected ';' after expression}}
+ // expected-error at -3 {{expected expression}}
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list