[PATCH] D43497: [analyzer] Introduce correct lifetime extension behavior in simple cases.
Devin Coughlin via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 20 19:56:21 PST 2018
dcoughlin accepted this revision.
dcoughlin added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks good to me. I have a comment about simplifying createTemporaryRegionIfNeeded() (if possible) inline.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngine.cpp:281
+
+ if (!TR) {
+ StorageDuration SD = MT->getStorageDuration();
----------------
Would it be safe for the body of the `if (!TR)` to be the else branch of `if constCXXTempObjectionRegion *const *TRPtr = ...` rather then its own if statement?
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngine.cpp:289
}
if (!TR)
TR = MRMgr.getCXXTempObjectRegion(Init, LC);
----------------
Would it be safe for `TR = MRMgr.getCXXTempObjectRegion(Init, LC);` to be the else branch of `if (const MaterializeTemporaryExpr *MT = dyn_cast<MaterializeTemporaryExpr>(Result))` rather than its own `if` statement?
Ideally the number paths through this function on which we call `MRMgr.getCXXTempObjectRegion()` would be small and very clear.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngine.cpp:490
+static void printTemporaryMaterializatinosForContext(
+ raw_ostream &Out, ProgramStateRef State, const char *NL, const char *Sep,
----------------
Nit: There is a typo in the name here ("Materializatinos"). I guess this is the sub-atomic particle created as a byproduct of materializing a temporary! We have a lot of materializatinos in Cupertino.
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/lifetime-extension.cpp:45
+ clang_analyzer_eval(z == 2);
+#ifdef TEMPORARIES
+ // expected-warning at -4{{TRUE}}
----------------
Yay!
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/lifetime-extension.cpp:78
+ {
+ const C &c = C(1, &after, &before);
+ }
----------------
Nice.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43497
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list