[PATCH] D43114: clang-format: fix formatting of ObjC @synchronized blocks
Ben Hamilton via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 9 07:46:29 PST 2018
benhamilton added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:1130
+ if (FormatTok->Tok.is(tok::l_brace)) {
+ if (Style.BraceWrapping.AfterObjCDeclaration)
+ addUnwrappedLine();
----------------
Typz wrote:
> Wondering if formatting with this style is appropriate: the clang-format doc points in that direction, but it seems to me both `@synchronized` and `@autoreleasepool` are more akin to "control statements".
>
> For consistency (esp. in ObjC++ code), as a user, I would tend to have these blocks indented like control statements while interfaces/implementations blocks would be indented like classes/structs.
>
> So maybe it would be better to introduce a new BraceWrapping style 'AfterObjCSpecialBlock` to control these cases, matching the possibilities that are given for control statements vs classes. What do you think?
Hmm, I definitely agree with that logic. I don't see them acting as declarations in any way, they are definitely like control statements.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43114
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list