[libcxx] r324307 - More patches ready

Mon Feb 5 17:59:28 PST 2018

Author: marshall
Date: Mon Feb  5 17:59:28 2018
New Revision: 324307

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=324307&view=rev
Log:
More patches ready

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=324307&r1=324306&r2=324307&view=diff
==============================================================================

--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Feb  5 17:59:28 2018
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2243">2243</a></td><td><tt>istream::putback</tt> problem</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2816">2816</a></td><td><tt>resize_file</tt> has impossible postcondition</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2843">2843</a></td><td>Unclear behavior of <tt>std::pmr::memory_resource::do_allocate()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2849">2849</a></td><td>Why does <tt>!is_regular_file(from)</tt> cause <tt>copy_file</tt> to report a "file already exists" error?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2851">2851</a></td><td><tt>std::filesystem</tt> enum classes are now underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2849">2849</a></td><td>Why does <tt>!is_regular_file(from)</tt> cause <tt>copy_file</tt> to report a "file already exists" error?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2851">2851</a></td><td><tt>std::filesystem</tt> enum classes are now underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2969">2969</a></td><td><tt>polymorphic_allocator::construct()</tt> shouldn't pass <tt>resource()</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2975">2975</a></td><td>Missing case for <tt>pair</tt> construction in scoped and polymorphic allocators</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2989">2989</a></td><td><tt>path</tt>'s stream insertion operator lets you insert everything under the sun</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Completed</td></tr>
@@ -77,15 +77,15 @@
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3010">3010</a></td><td>[networking.ts] <tt>uses_executor</tt> says "if a type <tt>T::executor_type</tt> exists"</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3013">3013</a></td><td><tt>(recursive_)directory_iterator</tt> construction and traversal should not be <tt>noexcept</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3014">3014</a></td><td>More <tt>noexcept</tt> issues with filesystem operations</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-      <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3015">3015</a></td><td><tt>copy_options::<i>unspecified</i></tt> underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3015">3015</a></td><td><tt>copy_options::<i>unspecified</i></tt> underspecified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3017">3017</a></td><td><tt>list splice</tt> functions should use <tt>addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3020">3020</a></td><td>[networking.ts] Remove spurious nested <tt>value_type</tt> buffer sequence requirement</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3026">3026</a></td><td><tt>filesystem::weakly_canonical</tt> still defined in terms of <tt>canonical(p, base)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3030">3030</a></td><td>Who shall meet the requirements of <tt>try_lock</tt>?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3034">3034</a></td><td>P0767R1 breaks previously-standard-layout types</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3035">3035</a></td><td><tt>std::allocator</tt>'s constructors should be <tt>constexpr</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3039">3039</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>thread</tt> and <tt>packaged_task</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3041">3041</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>reference_wrapper</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3035">3035</a></td><td><tt>std::allocator</tt>'s constructors should be <tt>constexpr</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3039">3039</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>thread</tt> and <tt>packaged_task</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3041">3041</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>reference_wrapper</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3042">3042</a></td><td><tt>is_literal_type_v</tt> should be inline</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3043">3043</a></td><td>Bogus postcondition for <tt>filesystem_error</tt> constructor</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
 <tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3045">3045</a></td><td><tt>atomic<<i>floating-point</i>></tt> doesn't have <tt>value_type</tt> or <tt>difference_type</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
 <li> 3026 - I think this is just wording cleanup - Eric?</li>
 <li> 3030 - Wording changes only?? Do we handle exceptions correctly here?</li>
 <li> 3034 - Need to check if our tests are correct.</li>
-<li> 3035 - <i>Easy to do</i></li>
+<li> 3035 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
 <li> 3039 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
 <li> 3041 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
 <li> 3042 - We already do this.</li>


