[libcxx] r324292 - Add issues in 'Review'

[Marshall Clow via cfe-commits]

Author: marshall
Date: Mon Feb  5 15:50:49 2018
New Revision: 324292

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=324292&view=rev
Log:
Add issues in 'Review'

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=324292&r1=324291&r2=324292&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Feb  5 15:50:49 2018
@@ -94,6 +94,17 @@
 
   </table>
 
+<h3>Issues to "Review"</h3>
+<table border="1">
+<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2412">2412</a></td><td><tt>promise::set_value()</tt> and <tt>promise::get_future()</tt> should not race</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2682">2682</a></td><td><code>filesystem::copy()</code> won't create a symlink to a directory</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2697">2697</a></td><td>[concurr.ts] Behavior of <tt>future/shared_future</tt> unwrapping constructor when given an invalid <tt>future</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2708">2708</a></td><td><tt>recursive_directory_iterator::recursion_pending()</tt> is incorrectly specified</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2936">2936</a></td><td>Path comparison is defined in terms of the generic format</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
+</table>
+
+
 <h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
 <ul>
 <li> 2164 - Writing tests here will be fun.</li>
@@ -121,8 +132,8 @@
 <li> 3030 - Wording changes only?? Do we handle exceptions correctly here?</li>
 <li> 3034 - Need to check if our tests are correct.</li>
 <li> 3035 - <i>Easy to do</i></li>
-<li> 3039 - We should implement P0777 first.</li>
-<li> 3041 - We should implement P0777 first.</li>
+<li> 3039 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
+<li> 3041 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
 <li> 3042 - We already do this.</li>
 <li> 3043 - We have a 'TODO(ericwf)' here</li>
 <li> 3045 - We haven't done the <atomic> rework yet.</li>
@@ -130,7 +141,16 @@
 <li> 3051 - Fixing an inadvertent wording change</li>
 </ul>
 
-<p>Last Updated: 29-Jan-2018</p>
+<h3>Comments about the "Review" issues</h3>
+<ul>
+<li> 2412 - </li>
+<li> 2682 - </li>
+<li> 2697 - </li>
+<li> 2708 - </li>
+<li> 2936 - </li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>Last Updated: 5-Feb-2018</p>
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>