[PATCH] D42758: Support `#pragma comment(lib, "name")` in the frontend for ELF
Paul Robinson via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 31 19:23:19 PST 2018
probinson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42758#993936, @ruiu wrote:
> > I also wonder which is better `#pragma comment(lib, "m")` or `#pragma comment(lib, "m")`.
>
> Sorry, I meant `#pragma comment(lib, "m")` or `#pragma comment("lib", "m")`.
I can't swear to it but I don't think Microsoft invented `#pragma comment`. Various IBM compilers have it, with a syntax of `#pragma comment ( <keyword> [ , "string" ] )`. I'm not seeing a `lib` keyword specifically in the IBM docs, but being a keyword would be consistent with past practice.
================
Comment at: lib/Parse/ParsePragma.cpp:299
+ getTargetInfo().getTriple().isOSBinFormatELF()) {
MSCommentHandler.reset(new PragmaCommentHandler(Actions));
PP.AddPragmaHandler(MSCommentHandler.get());
----------------
PS4's binary format is ELF, so you should be able to remove the isPS4 predicate.
================
Comment at: lib/Parse/ParsePragma.cpp:382
+ getTargetInfo().getTriple().isOSBinFormatELF()) {
PP.RemovePragmaHandler(MSCommentHandler.get());
MSCommentHandler.reset();
----------------
Don't need isPS4, as it uses ELF.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42758
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list