[PATCH] D42581: [NVPTX] Emit debug info in DWARF-2 by default for Cuda devices.
Artem Belevich via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 26 11:04:35 PST 2018
tra added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Driver/ToolChains/Cuda.cpp:353
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(Output.getFilename()));
+ if (mustEmitDebugInfo(Args) && Args.hasArg(options::OPT_g_Flag))
+ CmdArgs.push_back("-g");
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> tra wrote:
> > There's more than one -g option. Presumably you still want -g here for -g{1,2,3} or -ggdb{1,2,3} or -gdwarf2.
> >
> > Speaking of dwarf, what's going to happen if someone passes -gdwarf5? Should we downgrade it to -gdwarf2 on device side and issue a warning?
> >
> That's exactly what I want to avoid. I think we can ignore these options and handle only `-g` option.
> Or I can add a function to ToolChain class to force using the default settings for debugger tuning and DWARF version rather than take them from the driver options.
You should handle at least -gN/-gline-tables-only/-g. Now that we can emit dwarf debug info, I would want to be able to control it to some degree -- off/line-info-only/full.
I'm still not sure what's the plan for -gdwarfN unsupported on device side?
- do we ignore it and always emit dwarf2?
- do we accept it, emit requested version and let user stare at ptxas (or cuda-gdb) errors when it fails to deal with it?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42581
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list