[PATCH] D41990: [Frontend] Allow to use PrecompiledPreamble without calling CanReuse
Ilya Biryukov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 15 01:59:35 PST 2018
ilya-biryukov marked an inline comment as done.
ilya-biryukov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Frontend/PrecompiledPreamble.h:107
/// is accessible.
- /// For in-memory preambles, PrecompiledPreamble instance continues to own
- /// the MemoryBuffer with the Preamble after this method returns. The caller
- /// is reponsible for making sure the PrecompiledPreamble instance outlives
- /// the compiler run and the AST that will be using the PCH.
+ /// Callers of this function must ensure that that CanReuse() returns true for
+ /// the specified file before calling this function.
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> Simpler just as "/// Requires that CanReuse() is true."
Much more concise this way, thanks.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Frontend/PrecompiledPreamble.h:119
+ /// the PCH stored by this instance. This function is similar to
+ /// AddImplicitPreamble, but does require checking that CanReuse() returns
+ /// true prior to calling this function. Using this function allows to avoid
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> i think you mean "does not".
>
> I find some of the wording here confusing - "does not require checking" seems like too weak a claim. It's also a bit long, and hard to quickly see at a glance which function you might want to call.
>
> I'd suggest:
> /// Configure \CI to use this preamble for \p MainFileBuffer.
> /// Like AddImplicitPreamble, but doesn't assume or check CanReuse()!
> /// If this preamble doesn't match the file, it may parse differently.
>
Thanks, your wording looks much better.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41990
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list