[PATCH] D41512: [Sema] -Wtautological-constant-compare is too good. Cripple it.

[Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

aaron.ballman added inline comments.


================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td:440
 def TautologicalUnsignedEnumZeroCompare : DiagGroup<"tautological-unsigned-enum-zero-compare">;
+def TautologicalRangeCompare : DiagGroup<"tautological-constant-range-compare">;
 def TautologicalOutOfRangeCompare : DiagGroup<"tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare">;
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> smeenai wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > lebedev.ri wrote:
> > > > rsmith wrote:
> > > > > "tautological-constant-in-range-compare" would make more sense to me, as the complement of "tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare".
> > > > I did think about it.
> > > > To me "tautological-constant-in-range-compare" may sound as if the constant is //somewhere// in the range,
> > > > while i'd say "tautological-constant-range-compare" better highlights the fact that the constant *is* the range limit.
> > > > No?
> > > I don't have strong opinions on this name, but have a slight preference for "in range" because I'm left wondering how "range compare" relates to "out of range compare".
> > How about range-limit-compare or range-edge-compare or range-bound-compare or something of that nature, that explicitly captures the fact that it's the range limit?
> Ok, `def TautologicalInRangeCompare : DiagGroup<"tautological-constant-in-range-compare",` it is then.
I think @smeenai may have found a name I like better: tautological-range-limit-compare. @rsmith, what do you think?


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41512