[PATCH] D39284: Allow conditions to be decomposed with structured bindings

Zhihao Yuan via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 30 16:45:09 PDT 2017


lichray marked 3 inline comments as done.
lichray added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:696-698
+  // a for-range-declaration, or a condition in C++2a, but we parse it in more
+  // cases than that.
+  if (!D.mayHaveDecompositionDeclarator(getLangOpts())) {
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> Again, please don't guess what's going to be in C++2a. I would actually expect that we'll vote this in as a DR against C++17. It seems like a wording oversight to me.
I would say, use DR with parsimony... But OK.

OT: I'm writing a paper on `auto(x)` and `auto{x}` while implementing it.  Do you expect this to land as a DR?  In which form you expect it to appear in Clang?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39284





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list