[PATCH] D37341: [Sema] Fix an assert-on-invalid by avoiding function template specialisation deduction for invalid functions with fabricated template arguments

[Alex Lorenz via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

arphaman updated this revision to Diff 119967.
arphaman added a comment.

Use just the `isInvalidDecl` check.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D37341

Files:
  lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
  test/SemaTemplate/deduction-crash.cpp
  test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp


Index: test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp
+++ test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp
@@ -38,24 +38,20 @@
 
   template<typename T>
   template<int N>
-  void Baz<T>::bar() { // expected-note {{couldn't infer template argument 'N'}}
+  void Baz<T>::bar() {
   }
 
-  // FIXME: We shouldn't try to match this against a prior declaration if
-  // template parameter matching failed.
   template<typename T>
-  void Baz<T>::bar<0>() { // expected-error {{cannot specialize a member of an unspecialized template}} \
-                          // expected-error {{no function template matches}}
+  void Baz<T>::bar<0>() { // expected-error {{cannot specialize a member of an unspecialized template}}
   }
 }
 
 namespace PR19340 {
 template<typename T> struct Helper {
-  template<int N> static void func(const T *m) {} // expected-note {{failed template argument deduction}}
+  template<int N> static void func(const T *m) {}
 };
 
-template<typename T> void Helper<T>::func<2>() {} // expected-error {{cannot specialize a member}} \
-                                                  // expected-error {{no function template matches}}
+template<typename T> void Helper<T>::func<2>() {} // expected-error {{cannot specialize a member}}
 }
 
 namespace SpecLoc {
Index: test/SemaTemplate/deduction-crash.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaTemplate/deduction-crash.cpp
+++ test/SemaTemplate/deduction-crash.cpp
@@ -144,3 +144,20 @@
   template<typename T, typename U = void> int n<T *>; // expected-error +{{}} expected-note {{}}
   int k = n<void *>;
 }
+
+namespace deduceFunctionSpecializationForInvalidOutOfLineFunction {
+
+template <typename InputT, typename OutputT>
+struct SourceSelectionRequirement {
+  template<typename T>
+  OutputT evaluateSelectionRequirement(InputT &&Value) {
+  }
+};
+
+template <typename InputT, typename OutputT>
+OutputT SourceSelectionRequirement<InputT, OutputT>::
+evaluateSelectionRequirement<void>(InputT &&Value) { // expected-error {{cannot specialize a member of an unspecialized template}}
+  return Value;
+}
+
+}
Index: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -8962,10 +8962,10 @@
           diag::ext_function_specialization_in_class :
           diag::err_function_specialization_in_class)
           << NewFD->getDeclName();
-      } else if (CheckFunctionTemplateSpecialization(NewFD,
-                                  (HasExplicitTemplateArgs ? &TemplateArgs
-                                                           : nullptr),
-                                                     Previous))
+      } else if (!NewFD->isInvalidDecl() &&
+                 CheckFunctionTemplateSpecialization(
+                     NewFD, (HasExplicitTemplateArgs ? &TemplateArgs : nullptr),
+                     Previous))
         NewFD->setInvalidDecl();
 
       // C++ [dcl.stc]p1:


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D37341.119967.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3134 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20171023/69c14c2d/attachment.bin>