[PATCH] D38728: [analyzer] Use the signature of the primary template for issue hash calculation

[Gábor Horváth via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

xazax.hun added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D38728#895669, @NoQ wrote:

> I think it would be great to split them into two different patches, to be able to easily see how the change in the hashing affects the tests (and maybe revert easily if something goes wrong).


So you would commit the hash change first and the test change on the top of it? Or the other way around?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D38728