[PATCH] D38675: [analyzer] MisusedMovedObjectChecker: Moving the checker out of alpha state

[Daniel Marjamäki via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

danielmarjamaki added a reviewer: danielmarjamaki.
danielmarjamaki added a comment.

> However, the checker seems to work with a low false positive rate.  (<15 on the LLVM, 6 effectively different)

This does not sound like a low false positive rate to me. Could you describe what the false positives are? Is it possible to fix them?

> Is it enough or should I check it on other open source projects?

you should check a number of different projects. There might be idioms/usages in other projects that are not seen in LLVM.

However I don't know what other open source C++11 projects there are.

But I have a script that runs clang on various Debian projects and I can run that and provide you with the results.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D38675