r314499 - [Sema] Suppress warnings for C's zero initializer
Daniel Marjamaki via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 29 02:44:41 PDT 2017
Author: danielmarjamaki
Date: Fri Sep 29 02:44:41 2017
New Revision: 314499
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=314499&view=rev
Log:
[Sema] Suppress warnings for C's zero initializer
Patch by S. Gilles!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28148
Added:
cfe/trunk/test/Sema/zero-initializer.c
Modified:
cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Expr.h
cfe/trunk/lib/AST/Expr.cpp
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Expr.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Expr.h?rev=314499&r1=314498&r2=314499&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Expr.h (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Expr.h Fri Sep 29 02:44:41 2017
@@ -4011,6 +4011,10 @@ public:
/// initializer)?
bool isTransparent() const;
+ /// Is this the zero initializer {0} in a language which considers it
+ /// idiomatic?
+ bool isIdiomaticZeroInitializer(const LangOptions &LangOpts) const;
+
SourceLocation getLBraceLoc() const { return LBraceLoc; }
void setLBraceLoc(SourceLocation Loc) { LBraceLoc = Loc; }
SourceLocation getRBraceLoc() const { return RBraceLoc; }
@@ -4020,6 +4024,9 @@ public:
InitListExpr *getSemanticForm() const {
return isSemanticForm() ? nullptr : AltForm.getPointer();
}
+ bool isSyntacticForm() const {
+ return !AltForm.getInt() || !AltForm.getPointer();
+ }
InitListExpr *getSyntacticForm() const {
return isSemanticForm() ? AltForm.getPointer() : nullptr;
}
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/Expr.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/Expr.cpp?rev=314499&r1=314498&r2=314499&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/Expr.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/Expr.cpp Fri Sep 29 02:44:41 2017
@@ -1951,6 +1951,17 @@ bool InitListExpr::isTransparent() const
getInit(0)->getType().getCanonicalType();
}
+bool InitListExpr::isIdiomaticZeroInitializer(const LangOptions &LangOpts) const {
+ assert(isSyntacticForm() && "only test syntactic form as zero initializer");
+
+ if (LangOpts.CPlusPlus || getNumInits() != 1) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ const IntegerLiteral *Lit = dyn_cast<IntegerLiteral>(getInit(0));
+ return Lit && Lit->getValue() == 0;
+}
+
SourceLocation InitListExpr::getLocStart() const {
if (InitListExpr *SyntacticForm = getSyntacticForm())
return SyntacticForm->getLocStart();
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp?rev=314499&r1=314498&r2=314499&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp Fri Sep 29 02:44:41 2017
@@ -886,7 +886,8 @@ void InitListChecker::CheckImplicitInitL
}
// Complain about missing braces.
- if (T->isArrayType() || T->isRecordType()) {
+ if ((T->isArrayType() || T->isRecordType()) &&
+ !ParentIList->isIdiomaticZeroInitializer(SemaRef.getLangOpts())) {
SemaRef.Diag(StructuredSubobjectInitList->getLocStart(),
diag::warn_missing_braces)
<< StructuredSubobjectInitList->getSourceRange()
@@ -1833,7 +1834,9 @@ void InitListChecker::CheckStructUnionTy
// worthwhile to skip over the rest of the initializer, though.
RecordDecl *RD = DeclType->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
RecordDecl::field_iterator FieldEnd = RD->field_end();
- bool CheckForMissingFields = true;
+ bool CheckForMissingFields =
+ !IList->isIdiomaticZeroInitializer(SemaRef.getLangOpts());
+
while (Index < IList->getNumInits()) {
Expr *Init = IList->getInit(Index);
Added: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/zero-initializer.c
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/zero-initializer.c?rev=314499&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/zero-initializer.c (added)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/zero-initializer.c Fri Sep 29 02:44:41 2017
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wmissing-braces -verify %s
+
+// Tests that using {0} in struct initialization or assignment is supported
+struct foo { int x; int y; };
+struct bar { struct foo a; struct foo b; };
+struct A { int a; };
+struct B { struct A a; };
+struct C { struct B b; };
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ struct foo f = { 0 }; // no-warning
+ struct foo g = { 9 }; // expected-warning {{missing field 'y' initializer}}
+ struct foo h = { 9, 9 }; // no-warning
+ struct bar i = { 0 }; // no-warning
+ struct bar j = { 0, 0 }; // expected-warning {{suggest braces around initialization of subobject}} expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
+ struct bar k = { { 9, 9 }, { 9, 9 } }; // no-warning
+ struct bar l = { { 9, 9 }, { 0 } }; // no-warning
+ struct bar m = { { 0 }, { 0 } }; // no-warning
+ struct bar n = { { 0 }, { 9, 9 } }; // no-warning
+ struct bar o = { { 9 }, { 9, 9 } }; // expected-warning {{missing field 'y' initializer}}
+ struct C p = { 0 }; // no-warning
+ struct C q = { 9 }; // expected-warning {{suggest braces around initialization of subobject}} expected-warning {{suggest braces around initialization of subobject}}
+ f = (struct foo ) { 0 }; // no-warning
+ g = (struct foo ) { 9 }; // expected-warning {{missing field 'y' initializer}}
+ h = (struct foo ) { 9, 9 }; // no-warning
+ i = (struct bar) { 0 }; // no-warning
+ j = (struct bar) { 0, 0 }; // expected-warning {{suggest braces around initialization of subobject}} expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
+ k = (struct bar) { { 9, 9 }, { 9, 9 } }; // no-warning
+ l = (struct bar) { { 9, 9 }, { 0 } }; // no-warning
+ m = (struct bar) { { 0 }, { 0 } }; // no-warning
+ n = (struct bar) { { 0 }, { 9, 9 } }; // no-warning
+ o = (struct bar) { { 9 }, { 9, 9 } }; // expected-warning {{missing field 'y' initializer}}
+ p = (struct C) { 0 }; // no-warning
+ q = (struct C) { 9 }; // expected-warning {{suggest braces around initialization of subobject}} expected-warning {{suggest braces around initialization of subobject}}
+
+ return 0;
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list