[PATCH] D36410: [OpenCL] Handle taking address of block captures

Anastasia Stulova via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 7 08:01:38 PDT 2017


Anastasia added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36410#863409, @yaxunl wrote:

> LGTM as a temporary measure until we have a solution for properly emitting blocks as enqueued kernel.


Should I start discussion with Khronos on that? What would our preference be - implicitly `generic` AS for capture addresses?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D36410





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list