[PATCH] D36410: [OpenCL] Handle taking address of block captures

[Anastasia Stulova via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Anastasia added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36410#863409, @yaxunl wrote:

> LGTM as a temporary measure until we have a solution for properly emitting blocks as enqueued kernel.


Should I start discussion with Khronos on that? What would our preference be - implicitly `generic` AS for capture addresses?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D36410