[libcxx] r306269 - Updated for the Toronto meeting
Marshall Clow via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 25 21:25:15 PDT 2017
Author: marshall
Date: Sun Jun 25 21:25:15 2017
New Revision: 306269
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=306269&view=rev
Log:
Updated for the Toronto meeting
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=306269&r1=306268&r2=306269&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Sun Jun 25 21:25:15 2017
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
<!--*********************************************************************-->
<p>This is a temporary page; please check the c++1z status <a href="http://libcxx.llvm.org/cxx1z_status.html">here</a></p>
- <p>This page shows the status of the papers and issues that are expected to be adopted in Issaquah.</p>
+ <p>This page shows the status of the papers and issues that are expected to be adopted in Toronto.</p>
<p>The groups that have contributed papers:
<ul>
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
<li>SG1 - Study group #1 (Concurrency working group)</li>
</ul>
</p>
-
+
<h3>Paper Status</h3>
<table id="papers" border="1">
<tr><th>Paper #</th><th>Group</th><th>Paper Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th><th>First released version</th></tr>
@@ -59,71 +59,41 @@
<table id="issues" border="1">
<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2260">2260</a></td><td>Missing requirement for Allocator::pointer</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2768">2768</a></td><td>any_cast and move semantics</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769">2769</a></td><td>Redundant const in the return type of any_cast(const any&)</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2781">2781</a></td><td>Contradictory requirements for std::function and std::reference_wrapper</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2782">2782</a></td><td>scoped_allocator_adaptor constructors must be constrained</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2784">2784</a></td><td>Resolution to LWG 2484 is missing "otherwise, no effects" and is hard to parse</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2785">2785</a></td><td>quoted should work with basic_string_view</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2786">2786</a></td><td>Annex C should mention shared_ptr changes for array support</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2787">2787</a></td><td>§[file_status.cons] doesn't match class definition</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2789">2789</a></td><td>Equivalence of contained objects</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2794">2794</a></td><td>Missing requirements for allocator pointers</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2795">2795</a></td><td>§[global.functions] provides incorrect example of ADL use</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2804">2804</a></td><td>Unconditional constexpr default constructor for istream_iterator</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2812">2812</a></td><td>Range access is available with <string_view></td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2824">2824</a></td><td>list::sort should say that the order of elements is unspecified if an exception is thrown</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2826">2826</a></td><td>string_view iterators use old wording</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2834">2834</a></td><td>Resolution LWG 2223 is missing wording about end iterators</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2835">2835</a></td><td>LWG 2536 seems to misspecify <tgmath.h></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2837">2837</a></td><td>gcd and lcm should support a wider range of input values</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2838">2838</a></td><td>is_literal_type specification needs a little cleanup</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2842">2842</a></td><td>in_place_t check for optional::optional(U&&) should decay U</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2850">2850</a></td><td>std::function move constructor does unnecessary work</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2853">2853</a></td><td>Possible inconsistency in specification of erase in [vector.modifiers]</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2855">2855</a></td><td>std::throw_with_nested("string_literal")</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2444">2444</a></td><td>Inconsistent complexity for std::sort_heap</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2593">2593</a></td><td>Moved-from state of Allocators</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2597">2597</a></td><td>std::log misspecified for complex numbers</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2783">2783</a></td><td>stack::emplace() and queue::emplace() should return decltype(auto)</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2932">2932</a></td><td>Constraints on parallel algorithm implementations are underspecified</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2937">2937</a></td><td>Is equivalent("existing_thing", "not_existing_thing") an error?</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2940">2940</a></td><td>result_of specification also needs a little cleanup</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2942">2942</a></td><td>LWG 2873's resolution missed weak_ptr::owner_before</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2954">2954</a></td><td>Specialization of the convenience variable templates should be prohibited</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2961">2961</a></td><td>Bad postcondition for set_default_resource</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2966">2966</a></td><td>Incomplete resolution of US 74</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2974">2974</a></td><td>Diagnose out of bounds tuple_element/variant_alternative</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td><center><b>Priority 1 Bugs</b></center></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2665">2665</a></td><td>remove_filename() post condition is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td>We do this already</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2806">2806</a></td><td>Base class of bad_optional_access</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2857">2857</a></td><td>{variant,optional,any}::emplace should return the constructed value</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
</table>
<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
<ul>
-<li>2260 - Check our current allocators to make sure we do this</li>
-<li>2768 - Resolution is "apply 2769"</li>
-<li>2769 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li>
-<li>2781 - </li>
-<li>2782 - Looks straightforward.</li>
-<li>2784 - Patch Ready</li>
-<li>2785 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2786 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2787 - Eric? </li>
-<li>2789 - I don't think there are any code changes required here</li>
-<li>2794 - I don't think there are any code changes required here - maybe a static_assert.</li>
-<li>2795 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2804 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2812 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2824 - Nothing do to here, but we should add some throwing sort tests.</li>
-<li>2826 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2834 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2835 - I'm pretty sure we already do this.</li>
-<li>2837 - Added some tests to ensure we do this already.</li>
-<li>2838 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2842 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li>
-<li>2850 - I think we already do this.</li>
-<li>2853 - I think that this will be mostly adding tests.</li>
-<li>2855 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li></li>
-<li></li>
-<li>2665 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2806 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2857 - This is the subject of several NB comments.</li>
+<li>2444 - </li>
+<li>2593 - </li>
+<li>2597 - I think we do this already; probably needs tests</li>
+<li>2783 - should be easy to change; needs tests</li>
+<li>2932 - We're not doing the parallel algorithms yet.</li>
+<li>2937 - file system; Eric?</li>
+<li>2940 - We haven't implemented result_of yet, but I don't think that this will require any changes.</li>
+<li>2942 - all of our owner_before overloads are already noexcept; just need to update the tests.</li>
+<li>2954 - I don't think there's anything to do here.</li>
+<li>2961 - We haven't implemented the PMR stuff yet.</li>
+<li>2966 - Wording cleanup; no code or test changes needed.</li>
+<li>2974 - I have some code lying around that does this.</li>
</ul>
-<p>Last Updated: 7-Feb-2017</p>
+<p>Last Updated: 25-Jun-2017</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list