[PATCH] D34439: Add GCC's noexcept-type alias for c++1z-compat-mangling

[Raphael Isemann via cfe-commits]

I couldn't find a case where both gcc and clang agreed at the same
time that they should emit this warning, but I think that's just bugs
in the way we detect these cases. From the near-identical warning
message I would say they both should emit warnings for the same cases
(and probably will in the future).

2017-06-21 19:41 GMT+02:00 Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>:
> Does the GCC warning warn on the same cases?
>
> On 21 Jun 2017 10:24 am, "Akira Hatanaka via Phabricator"
> <reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> ahatanak added a comment.
>>
>> I didn't know gcc had its own option. This change seems reasonable to me.
>>
>> Since c++1z-compat-mangling was added just a few days ago, should we just
>> rename it instead of adding an alias?
>>
>>
>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D34439
>>
>>
>>
>