[PATCH] D34277: [analyzer] Bump default performance thresholds?

[Anna Zaks via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

zaks.anna added a comment.

> Maybe we should introduce another UMK_* for deeper analysis instead?

The difference here is not substantial enough to warrant a new level. The general motivation for bumping these numbers is that we've set the timeouts many years ago and the hardware improved quite a bit since then.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34277