[PATCH] D34002: [clang-tidy] When" -fno-exceptions is used", this warning is better to be suppressed.

[Chih-Hung Hsieh via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

chh added a comment.

Android source is suppressing misc-noexcept-move-constructor warnings
because -fno-exceptions is used and Android does not like to add more
exception specific code.

It's not a big deal for Android to suppress this check one way or the other.
I don't mind reverting it, just curious why a compiler cannot assume noexcept under -fno-exceptions.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34002