[PATCH] D33588: Fix two sources of UB in __next_hash_pow2 (from __hash_table)

[Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

mclow.lists added a comment.

I can reproduce this, but I'd rather figure out why we're calling `__next_hash_pow2(0)` or `(1)` before deciding how to fix it.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D33588