[PATCH] D33092: [analyzer] Add checker to model builtin functions

[Gábor Horváth via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

xazax.hun updated this revision to Diff 98609.
xazax.hun marked an inline comment as done.
xazax.hun edited the summary of this revision.
xazax.hun added a comment.

- Move this to the right checker.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D33092

Files:
  lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp
  test/Analysis/builtin-assume.c


Index: test/Analysis/builtin-assume.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Analysis/builtin-assume.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify %s
+
+void clang_analyzer_eval(int);
+
+void f(int i) {
+  __builtin_assume(i < 10);
+  clang_analyzer_eval(i < 15); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
+}
Index: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp
+++ lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinFunctionChecker.cpp
@@ -41,6 +41,21 @@
   default:
     return false;
 
+  case Builtin::BI__builtin_assume: {
+    assert (CE->arg_begin() != CE->arg_end());
+    SVal ArgSVal = state->getSVal(CE->getArg(0), LCtx);
+    if (ArgSVal.isUndef())
+      return true; // Return true to model purity.
+
+    state = state->assume(ArgSVal.castAs<DefinedOrUnknownSVal>(), true);
+    // FIXME: do we want to warn here?
+    if (!state)
+      return true;
+
+    C.addTransition(state);
+    return true;
+  }
+
   case Builtin::BI__builtin_unpredictable:
   case Builtin::BI__builtin_expect:
   case Builtin::BI__builtin_assume_aligned:


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D33092.98609.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1259 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20170511/0b98962b/attachment.bin>