r300303 - clang/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c: Relax an expression for targeting PECOFF.

[NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits]

Could you confirm if it is right fix?

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:29 PM NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Author: chapuni
> Date: Thu Apr 13 22:16:48 2017
> New Revision: 300303
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=300303&view=rev
> Log:
> clang/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c: Relax an expression for
> targeting PECOFF.
>
> Modified:
>     cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c?rev=300303&r1=300302&r2=300303&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c Thu Apr 13 22:16:48 2017
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  // RUN: FileCheck -check-prefix=SYSHEADER -input-file %t %s
>
>  // CHECK-DAG: @__profc_bar
> -// CHECK-DAG: @__llvm_prf_nm = private constant {{.*}}, section
> "{{.*}}__llvm_prf_names"
> +// CHECK-DAG: @__llvm_prf_nm = private constant {{.*}}, section
> "{{.*__llvm_prf_names|.*lprfn}}"
>
>  // These are never instantiated, so we shouldn't get counters for them.
>  //
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20170414/532beabb/attachment.html>