[PATCH] D30739: [OpenMP] "declare simd" for AArch64 Advanced SIMD.

[Francesco Petrogalli via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

fpetrogalli added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30739#706292, @Hahnfeld wrote:

> In principal looks good to me although I'm not really familiar with this part. Does that work for you if you have the `declare simd` in a header file and the implementation in another file? On x86_64 I currently get:


The current infrastructure for vector names generation works only for function definition. Ideally we should implement it also for function definition provided by external libraries.

>   remark: loop not vectorized: call instruction cannot be vectorized
> 
> 
> But that seems to be a general problem inside LLVM's LoopVectorize pass...

AFAIK, none of the machinery required in LLVM to expose the mangled names in the vectorizer is present in trunk. There is a patch for x86 under review that does that: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22792


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30739