[clang-tools-extra] r296888 - [clang-tidy] Yet another docs fixes

[Piotr Padlewski via cfe-commits]

Author: prazek
Date: Fri Mar  3 11:16:11 2017
New Revision: 296888

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=296888&view=rev
Log:
[clang-tidy] Yet another docs fixes

Modified:
    clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst

Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst?rev=296888&r1=296887&r2=296888&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst (original)
+++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst Fri Mar  3 11:16:11 2017
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ exception safe. In this case the calls o
 
 This is because replacing it with ``emplace_back`` could cause a leak of this
 pointer if ``emplace_back`` would throw exception before emplacement (e.g. not
-enough memory to add new element).
+enough memory to add a new element).
 
 For more info read item 42 - "Consider emplacement instead of insertion." of
 Scott Meyers "Effective Modern C++".
@@ -79,14 +79,15 @@ The default smart pointers that are cons
 other classes use the :option:`SmartPointers` option.
 
 
-Check also fires if any argument of constructor call would be:
+Check also doesn't fire if any argument of the constructor call would be:
 
-  - bitfield (bitfields can't bind to rvalue/universal reference)
+  - a bit-field (bit-fields can't bind to rvalue/universal reference)
 
-  - ``new`` expression (to avoid leak) or if the argument would be converted via
-    derived-to-base cast.
+  - a ``new`` expression (to avoid leak)
 
-This check requires C++11 of higher to run.
+  - if the argument would be converted via derived-to-base cast.
+
+This check requires C++11 or higher to run.
 
 Options
 -------