[PATCH] D29908: Disallow returning a __block variable via a move
Akira Hatanaka via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 14 21:27:16 PST 2017
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL295150: [Sema] Disallow returning a __block variable via a move. (authored by ahatanak).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29908?vs=88430&id=88486#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29908
Files:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjCXX/blocks.mm
Index: cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjCXX/blocks.mm
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjCXX/blocks.mm
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjCXX/blocks.mm
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fblocks -Wno-objc-root-class %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fblocks -Wno-objc-root-class -std=c++11 %s
@protocol NSObject;
void bar(id(^)(void));
@@ -144,3 +144,17 @@
template void f<X>(X);
}
+
+namespace MoveBlockVariable {
+struct B0 {
+};
+
+struct B1 { // expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor (the implicit}}
+ B1(B0&&); // expected-note {{candidate constructor not viable}}
+};
+
+B1 test_move() {
+ __block B0 b;
+ return b; // expected-error {{no viable conversion from returned value of type 'MoveBlockVariable::B0' to function return type 'MoveBlockVariable::B1'}}
+}
+}
Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
===================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
@@ -2743,15 +2743,17 @@
// ...automatic...
if (!VD->hasLocalStorage()) return false;
+ // Return false if VD is a __block variable. We don't want to implicitly move
+ // out of a __block variable during a return because we cannot assume the
+ // variable will no longer be used.
+ if (VD->hasAttr<BlocksAttr>()) return false;
+
if (AllowParamOrMoveConstructible)
return true;
// ...non-volatile...
if (VD->getType().isVolatileQualified()) return false;
- // __block variables can't be allocated in a way that permits NRVO.
- if (VD->hasAttr<BlocksAttr>()) return false;
-
// Variables with higher required alignment than their type's ABI
// alignment cannot use NRVO.
if (!VD->getType()->isDependentType() && VD->hasAttr<AlignedAttr>() &&
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D29908.88486.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1820 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20170215/0dc4f65d/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list