[libcxx] r294311 - Mark LWG2784 as ready

[Marshall Clow via cfe-commits]

Author: marshall
Date: Tue Feb  7 09:34:20 2017
New Revision: 294311

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294311&view=rev
Log:
Mark LWG2784 as ready

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=294311&r1=294310&r2=294311&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Tue Feb  7 09:34:20 2017
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769">2769</a></td><td>Redundant const in the return type of any_cast(const any&)</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2781">2781</a></td><td>Contradictory requirements for std::function and std::reference_wrapper</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2782">2782</a></td><td>scoped_allocator_adaptor constructors must be constrained</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2784">2784</a></td><td>Resolution to LWG 2484 is missing "otherwise, no effects" and is hard to parse</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2784">2784</a></td><td>Resolution to LWG 2484 is missing "otherwise, no effects" and is hard to parse</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2785">2785</a></td><td>quoted should work with basic_string_view</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2786">2786</a></td><td>Annex C should mention shared_ptr changes for array support</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2787">2787</a></td><td>§[file_status.cons] doesn't match class definition</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
 <li>2769 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li>
 <li>2781 - </li>
 <li>2782 - Looks straightforward.</li>
-<li>2784 - I think we do this already; maybe more tests (esp about 'inaccessible base class')</li>
+<li>2784 - Patch Ready</li>
 <li>2785 - We do this already.</li>
 <li>2786 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
 <li>2787 - Eric? </li>