[PATCH] D24969: [Sema] Use the instantiated name of destructors in FindInstantiatedDecl and RebuildMemberExpr
Richard Smith via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 31 15:23:15 PST 2017
On 31 January 2017 at 14:49, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> Richard, what do you think? I don't believe this fixes a 3.9
> regression, but the fix looks small, so it might be worth it.
>
I think on the whole the benefit of this change outweighs the risk of it
regressing something.
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanaka at apple.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the review. r293678.
> >
> > Should this be merged to 4.0?
> >
> >> On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Akira Hatanaka via Phabricator via
> cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed
> changes.
> >> Closed by commit rL293678: [Sema] Transform a templated name before
> looking it up in (authored by ahatanak).
> >>
> >> Changed prior to commit:
> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D24969?vs=82134&id=86474#toc
> >>
> >> Repository:
> >> rL LLVM
> >>
> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D24969
> >>
> >> Files:
> >> cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
> >> cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
> >> cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp
> >>
> >>
> >> Index: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp
> >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp
> >> @@ -431,3 +431,23 @@
> >>
> >> // The constructor definition should not have errors
> >> Invalid::~Invalid() {}
> >> +
> >> +namespace PR30361 {
> >> +template <typename T>
> >> +struct C1 {
> >> + ~C1() {}
> >> + operator C1<T>* () { return nullptr; }
> >> + void foo1();
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +template<typename T>
> >> +void C1<T>::foo1() {
> >> + C1::operator C1<T>*();
> >> + C1::~C1();
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +void foo1() {
> >> + C1<int> x;
> >> + x.foo1();
> >> +}
> >> +}
> >> Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
> >> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
> >> @@ -4990,8 +4990,12 @@
> >> NamedDecl *Result = nullptr;
> >> // FIXME: If the name is a dependent name, this lookup won't
> necessarily
> >> // find it. Does that ever matter?
> >> - if (D->getDeclName()) {
> >> - DeclContext::lookup_result Found = ParentDC->lookup(D->
> getDeclName());
> >> + if (auto Name = D->getDeclName()) {
> >> + DeclarationNameInfo NameInfo(Name, D->getLocation());
> >> + Name = SubstDeclarationNameInfo(NameInfo,
> TemplateArgs).getName();
> >> + if (!Name)
> >> + return nullptr;
> >> + DeclContext::lookup_result Found = ParentDC->lookup(Name);
> >> Result = findInstantiationOf(Context, D, Found.begin(),
> Found.end());
> >> } else {
> >> // Since we don't have a name for the entity we're looking for,
> >> Index: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
> >> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
> >> @@ -8966,12 +8966,18 @@
> >> // base (and therefore couldn't do the check) and a
> >> // nested-name-qualifier (and therefore could do the lookup).
> >> NamedDecl *FirstQualifierInScope = nullptr;
> >> + DeclarationNameInfo MemberNameInfo = E->getMemberNameInfo();
> >> + if (MemberNameInfo.getName()) {
> >> + MemberNameInfo = getDerived().TransformDeclarationNameInfo(
> MemberNameInfo);
> >> + if (!MemberNameInfo.getName())
> >> + return ExprError();
> >> + }
> >>
> >> return getDerived().RebuildMemberExpr(Base.get(), FakeOperatorLoc,
> >> E->isArrow(),
> >> QualifierLoc,
> >> TemplateKWLoc,
> >> - E->getMemberNameInfo(),
> >> + MemberNameInfo,
> >> Member,
> >> FoundDecl,
> >> (E->hasExplicitTemplateArgs()
> >>
> >>
> >> <D24969.86474.patch>_______________________________________________
> >> cfe-commits mailing list
> >> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20170131/7f684b14/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list