[libcxx] r292582 - Still expose std::align_val_t in C++17 even if we don't have aligned new/delete.
Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 20 00:04:52 PST 2017
Merged as r292586.
I waited for all of the failing bots to rerun, but I didn't want to break
builds all night.
/Eric
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch addresses issues introduced by r292564. Specifically it makes
> `align_val_t.pass.cpp` pass in C++17 even if the system
> doesn't support aligned new/delete.
>
> Because r292564 was merged into 4.0, this should be as well.
>
> @Marshall can you OK this?
>
> /Eric
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: ericwf
>> Date: Fri Jan 20 00:27:34 2017
>> New Revision: 292582
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=292582&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Still expose std::align_val_t in C++17 even if we don't have aligned
>> new/delete.
>>
>> r292564 disabled the aligned new/delete overloads on platforms without
>> posix_memalign. Unfortunately that patch also disabled the align_val_t
>> definition in C++17 as well.
>>
>> This patch causes align_val_t to be exposed in C++17 regardless
>> of if we have the new/delete overloads.
>>
>> Modified:
>> libcxx/trunk/include/new
>>
>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/new
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/new
>> ?rev=292582&r1=292581&r2=292582&view=diff
>> ============================================================
>> ==================
>> --- libcxx/trunk/include/new (original)
>> +++ libcxx/trunk/include/new Fri Jan 20 00:27:34 2017
>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ public:
>>
>> #endif // defined(_LIBCPP_BUILDING_NEW) || (_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 11)
>>
>> -#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION
>> +#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION) || _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 14
>> #ifndef _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG
>> enum class _LIBCPP_ENUM_VIS align_val_t : size_t { };
>> #else
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20170120/d4ef113d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list