[PATCH] D27815: [clang-tidy] Add obvious module for obvious bugs

[Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

aaron.ballman added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27815#626440, @Prazek wrote:

> The example of this kind of check is here:
>  https://reviews.llvm.org/D27806
>
> I am not sure if it make sense to put it as clang warning.
>
> After a little bit of thinking I guess name "typos" would be better, because I want to look for checks that are mostly typos (which are obvious btw) but it would make it more concrete.


When I hear "typo", I think "misspelling" and wonder how it differs from the typo correction that clang frontend has. I've usually heard of what your linked review covers as a "thinko" (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/thinko) because you made a logical mistake rather than a misspelling, but that's a pretty awful name for the module. ;-)

Perhaps "mistake-", "oops-", "derp-" or something along those lines (well, maybe not "derp")?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D27815