[PATCH] D27104: Unify and simplify the behavior of the hasDeclaration matcher.

[Łukasz Anforowicz via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

lukasza added a comment.

Do we also need to update the documentation (e.g. to say that ElaboratedType is covered by hasDeclaration)?

Other than that, I think this CL LGTM, although I would like to have a specific, working equivalent of the old, deep-maching hasDeclaration (at least when the inner, deep match is for tag types).  Let's continue this discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D27207


https://reviews.llvm.org/D27104