[PATCH] D25777: [Sema][TreeTransform] Re-create DesignatedInitExpr when it has a field designator with a valid FieldDecl
Alex Lorenz via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 21 04:55:14 PDT 2016
arphaman updated this revision to Diff 75414.
arphaman added a comment.
The updated patch addresses John's comment by modifying the `DesignatedInitExpr` re-creation logic.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25777
Files:
lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
test/SemaCXX/designated-initializers.cpp
Index: test/SemaCXX/designated-initializers.cpp
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ test/SemaCXX/designated-initializers.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Winitializer-overrides %s
+
+template <typename T> struct Foo {
+ struct SubFoo {
+ int bar1;
+ int bar2;
+ };
+
+ static void Test() { SubFoo sf = {.bar1 = 10, .bar2 = 20}; } // Expected no warning
+};
+
+void foo() {
+ Foo<int>::Test();
+ Foo<bool>::Test();
+ Foo<float>::Test();
+}
+
+template <typename T> struct Bar {
+ struct SubFoo {
+ int bar1;
+ int bar2;
+ };
+
+ static void Test() { SubFoo sf = {.bar1 = 10, // expected-note 2 {{previous initialization is here}}
+ .bar1 = 20}; } // expected-warning 2 {{initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
+};
+
+void bar() {
+ Bar<int>::Test(); // expected-note {{in instantiation of member function 'Bar<int>::Test' requested here}}
+ Bar<bool>::Test(); // expected-note {{in instantiation of member function 'Bar<bool>::Test' requested here}}
+}
Index: lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
+++ lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
@@ -8923,6 +8923,19 @@
Desig.AddDesignator(Designator::getField(D.getFieldName(),
D.getDotLoc(),
D.getFieldLoc()));
+ if (D.getField()) {
+ FieldDecl *Field = dyn_cast_or_null<FieldDecl>(
+ getDerived().TransformDecl(D.getFieldLoc(), D.getField()));
+ if (Field != D.getField())
+ // Rebuild the expression when the transformed FieldDecl is
+ // different to the already assigned FieldDecl.
+ ExprChanged = true;
+ } else {
+ // Ensure that the designator expression is rebuilt when there isn't
+ // a resolved FieldDecl in the designator as we don't want to assign
+ // a FieldDecl to a pattern designator that will be instantiated again.
+ ExprChanged = true;
+ }
continue;
}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D25777.75414.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2178 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20161021/139108ea/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list