[libcxx] r283799 - Update with the rest of the results from the 7-Oct Telecom

Marshall Clow via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 10 14:00:12 PDT 2016 

Author: marshall
Date: Mon Oct 10 16:00:12 2016
New Revision: 283799

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=283799&view=rev
Log:
Update with the rest of the results from the 7-Oct Telecom


Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=283799&r1=283798&r2=283799&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Oct 10 16:00:12 2016
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2221">2221</a></td><td>No formatted output operator for nullptr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2223">2223</a></td><td>shrink_to_fit effect on iterator validity</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2261">2261</a></td><td>Are containers required to use their 'pointer' type internally?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
-	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2358">2358</a></td><td>Apparently-bogus definition of is_empty type trait</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2394">2394</a></td><td>locale::name specification unclear - what is implementation-defined?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2460">2460</a></td><td>LWG issue 2408 and value categories</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2468">2468</a></td><td>Self-move-assignment of library types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -114,7 +113,7 @@
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2742">2742</a></td><td>Inconsistent string interface taking string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2744">2744</a></td><td>any's in_place constructors</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2745">2745</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] Implementability of LWG 2451</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
-	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2747">2747</a></td><td>Possibly redundant std::move in [alg.foreach]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2747">2747</a></td><td>Possibly redundant std::move in [alg.foreach]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2748">2748</a></td><td>swappable traits for optionals</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2749">2749</a></td><td>swappable traits for variants</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2750">2750</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] LWG 2451 conversion constructor constraint</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -123,12 +122,17 @@
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2754">2754</a></td><td>The in_place constructors and emplace functions added by P0032R3 don't require CopyConstructible</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2755">2755</a></td><td>ยง[string.view.io] uses non-existent basic_string_view::to_string function</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2756">2756</a></td><td>C++ WP optional<T> should 'forward' T's implicit conversions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2758">2758</a></td><td>std::string{}.assign("ABCDE", 0, 1) is ambiguous</td><td>We already do this</td><td></td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2759">2759</a></td><td>gcd / lcm and bool for the WP</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2760">2760</a></td><td>non-const basic_string::data should not invalidate iterators</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2765">2765</a></td><td>Did LWG 1123 go too far?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2767">2767</a></td><td>not_fn call_wrapper can form invalid types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2768">2768</a></td><td>any_cast and move semantics</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
-	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769">2769</a></td><td>Redundant const in the return type of any_cast(const any&)</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+<!-- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769">2769</a></td><td>Redundant const in the return type of any_cast(const any&)</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr> -->
+	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2771">2771</a></td><td>Broken Effects of some basic_string::compare functions in terms of basic_string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
+	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2773">2773</a></td><td>Making std::ignore constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2777">2777</a></td><td>basic_string_view::copy should use char_traits::copy</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	 <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2778">2778</a></td><td>basic_string_view is missing constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
   </table>
 
 <h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
@@ -138,7 +142,6 @@
 <li>2221 - Patch and tests ready</li>
 <li>2223 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
 <li>2261 - <b>Survey our containers to make sure we do this.</b> Ideally, this will result in no code changes.</li>
-<li>2358 - We already do this; I improved the tests</li>
 <li>2394 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
 <li>2460 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
 <li>2468 - <i>I think we already do this; but will need to survey the libray to be sure</i></li>
@@ -188,7 +191,7 @@
 <li>2742 - Patch and tests ready</li>
 <li>2744 - <i>std::any</i></li>
 <li>2745 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
-<li>2747 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
+<li>2747 - Patch ready, but I can't think of any way to test it.</li>
 <li>2748 - <i>std::optional</i></li>
 <li>2749 - <i>std::variant</i></li>
 <li>2750 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
@@ -197,12 +200,17 @@
 <li>2754 - </li>
 <li>2755 - Both string and string_view call a common routine for output; so no code changes needed.</li>
 <li>2756 - <i>std::optional</i></li>
+<li>2758 - We already do this. </li>
 <li>2759 - Patch and tests ready</li>
 <li>2760 - This is just wording cleanup; no code or test changes needed.</li>
 <li>2765 - is this just wording cleanup????? I don't think this actually requires code changes. </li>
 <li>2767 - </li>
 <li>2768 - <i>std::any</i></li>
-<li>2769 - <i>std::any</i></li>
+<!-- <li>2769 - <i>std::any</i></li> -->
+<li>2771 - We already do this.</li>
+<li>2773 - </li>
+<li>2777 - This should be easy; existing tests should suffice</li>
+<li>2778 - This is mostly tests.</li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>Last Updated: 10-Oct-2016</p>

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list