[llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator

[Alex Bradbury via cfe-commits]

On 30 September 2016 at 14:21, Eric Liu via llvm-commits
<llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Aaron! :)
>
> I've disabled it. I think the annoying part really is the status (e.g.
> Request, Closed etc) in the tag, and I am wondering if a tag with just line
> numbers like "(N Loc)" would be better. But I'm not really sure about the
> trade-off here.

I'd suggest that [PATCH] is a waste of screen real estate too - the
`Dnnnnn:` prefix makes it obvious. I do appreciate there's an argument
for having it for consistency with people who post patches directly to
llvm-commits.

Alex