[ReviewRequest] [Sema/Parser] GCC Compatibility Patch: Support for __final specifier

David Majnemer via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 25 13:17:50 PDT 2016


You've added a comment describing the new enum value.  Please make sure the
comment starts with a cap letter and ends with a period.

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Keane, Erich <erich.keane at intel.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the quick review!  I’ve updated the patch with the name changes
> in the attached diff file.
>
>
>
> *From:* David Majnemer [mailto:david.majnemer at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 12:40 PM
> *To:* Keane, Erich <erich.keane at intel.com>
> *Cc:* cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ReviewRequest] [Sema/Parser] GCC Compatibility Patch:
> Support for __final specifier
>
>
>
> I'd rename VS_Alt_Final to VS_GNU_Final.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Keane, Erich via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all, my first potential-contribution, so I apologize if I’m submitting
> this improperly, I’m unfamiliar with the ‘type’ keys that you use in the
> topic, so hopefully I have this right.
>
>
>
> As reported in bug 28473, GCC supports ‘final’ functionality in pre-C++11
> code using the __final keyword.  Clang currently supports the ‘final’
> keyword in accordance with the C++11 specification, however it ALSO
> supports it in pre-C++11 mode, with a warning.
>
>
>
> This patch adds the ‘__final’ keyword for compatibility with GCC in GCC
> Keywords mode (so it is enabled with existing flags), and issues a warning
> on its usage (suggesting switching to the C++11 keyword).  This patch also
> adds a regression test for the functionality described.  I believe this
> patch has minimal impact, as it simply adds a new keyword for existing
> behavior.
>
>
>
> This has been validated with check-clang to avoid regressions.  Patch is
> created in reference to revisions 276665
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Erich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20160725/7357b768/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list