[PATCH] D21643: Default to using the Unicode version of Win32 APIs
Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 23 08:29:04 PDT 2016
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21643#465583, @llvm-commits wrote:
> Should we add overloads of the UTF8 conversion functions that accept
> wstrings?
I think we should eventually consider cleaning up our Unicode APIs because they're kind of all over the place. For instance, WindowsSupport.h has a different set of APIs for handling Unicode conversions that compete with the ones exposed by ConvertUTF.h.
> In line with what rnk said, I'm curious about the implications of simply
> #undef'ing all the non A/W versions of functions so that you have to make
> the choice explicit
I'm not certain I follow along. Are you suggesting we explicitly #undef something like RegQueryValueEx so that you must explicitly call RegQueryValueExW or RegQueryValueExA, as needed? That seems like something that will quickly get forgotten about and not really used.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21643
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list