[PATCH] D20407: [CodeGen][ObjC] zero-ext an i1 value to i8

[Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits]

ahatanak added a comment.

I've managed to remove _Atomic from the types of the return and parameter of getter and setter functions in my new patch.

I'm not sure how I should handle typedefs though. If I had the following typedef,

typedef _Atomic(_Bool) AtomicBool,

would it be OK to desugar the typedef and then remove _Atomic? I'm not sure this is always correct because dusugaring typedefs will remove the attributes attached to them that might be important too.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D20407