[PATCH] D19849: [clang-tidy] MoveConstructorInitCheck - Add parameter name to check message.

[Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits]

aaron.ballman added a subscriber: aaron.ballman.
aaron.ballman added a comment.

I'm not opposed to showing the name, but I'm not certain I understand under what circumstances the name would be useful. Since this is triggering on move constructors, and move constructors can only have one parameter, the name seems wholly redundant, isn't it?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D19849