[PATCH] D19403: Add loop pragma for Loop Distribution
Adam Nemet via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 28 09:32:52 PDT 2016
anemet added inline comments.
================
Comment at: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst:2161
@@ +2160,3 @@
+
+ #pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
+ for(...) {
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> It would be nice to use a more compelling example than an empty for loop. Also, it would be helpful if the user understood why they wouldn't use this pragma for every loop (or why it doesn't happen by default).
Sure, I just followed the vectorizer example but you're right this needs more context. Let me update the patch.
Thanks for the review!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19403
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list