[PATCH] D19275: Do not register incompatible C++ destructors with __cxa_atexit

[JF Bastien via cfe-commits]

jfb added a subscriber: pcc.
jfb added a comment.

> I guess there's a more general issue here which is that LLVM appears to be more permissive about prototype mismatch than wasm. Specifically, I'm thinking about how swifterror relies on being able to pass extra parameters to a function that doesn't expect them and not get UB. I guess as long as LLVM doesn't introduce any prototype mismatch during optimization, that's OK, but this seems like it would be a real problem if we ever wanted to port swift to wasm.


Yeah @dschuff, @sunfish and I were also talking about `__cxa_pure_virtual` being in the same signature-type-mismatch category. I wonder if this also makes CFI sad, /cc @pcc.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D19275