[PATCH] D15305: [CUDA] Do not allow dynamic initialization of global device side variables.
Richard Smith via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 1 13:17:18 PST 2016
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Some minor things, but feel free to commit after addressing them.
I agree that we should figure out what to do about the zero/undef initialization separately.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp:429-430
@@ +428,4 @@
+ CXXConstructorDecl *CD) {
+ if (!CD->isDefined() && CD->isTemplateInstantiation())
+ InstantiateFunctionDefinition(VarLoc, CD->getFirstDecl());
+
----------------
The function might still not be defined after this (if the template is not defined); you should presumably return `false` here in that case.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp:442
@@ +441,3 @@
+ // and the function body is an empty compound statement.
+ if (!(CD->isDefined() && CD->getNumParams() == 0 && CD->hasTrivialBody()))
+ return false;
----------------
Please do remove the `isDefined` check here. Including it makes a reader wonder what case it's trying to handle.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCUDA.cpp:455-457
@@ +454,5 @@
+
+ // Its class has no virtual functions and no virtual base classes.
+ if (CD->getParent()->isDynamicClass())
+ return false;
+
----------------
Maybe reorder this before the `CXXCtorInitializer` check? It's a much cheaper test.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:10191-10198
@@ +10190,10 @@
+ bool AllowedInit = false;
+ if (const CXXConstructExpr *CE = dyn_cast<CXXConstructExpr>(Init))
+ AllowedInit =
+ isEmptyCudaConstructor(VD->getLocation(), CE->getConstructor());
+ else if ((VD->hasAttr<CUDADeviceAttr>() ||
+ VD->hasAttr<CUDAConstantAttr>()) &&
+ VD->getInit()->isConstantInitializer(
+ Context, VD->getType()->isReferenceType()))
+ AllowedInit = true;
+
----------------
What should happen if the init is a constant initializer that is a `CXXConstructExpr`, but it uses a constructor that is not empty from CUDA's perspective? Such as:
struct X { constexpr X() { int n = 0; } };
__device__ X x;
I would assume this should be valid, but I think you'll reject it. Maybe change `else if (` to `if (!AllowedInit &&`?
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:10196-10198
@@ +10195,5 @@
+ VD->hasAttr<CUDAConstantAttr>()) &&
+ VD->getInit()->isConstantInitializer(
+ Context, VD->getType()->isReferenceType()))
+ AllowedInit = true;
+
----------------
Might be clearer as
if (__device__ || __constant__)
AllowedInit = isConstantInitializer(...)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15305
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list