[PATCH] D16517: ClangTidy check to flag uninitialized builtin and pointer fields.

[Felix Berger via cfe-commits]

flx added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16517#336148, @alexfh wrote:

> A high-level comment: I think, this comment <http://reviews.llvm.org/D10553#267535> still applies. I'm also slightly concerned about having this check in misc-, since the check isn't universally applicable (e.g. based on a couple of discussions, I guess LLVM community would likely not welcome this rule), but I'd like to leave misc- enabled by default. So moving the check to cppcoreguidelines- makes sense to me.
>
> More substantial comments later.


Sounds good to me. If I'm reading the original comment correctly what's missing would be this part:

"Issue a diagnostic when constructing an object of a trivially constructible type without () or {} to initialize its members. To fix: Add () or {}. "

Is that correct?

Please let me know if that changes the name of the check and whether the next step should be moving the check or we'll do that after a detailed review of the specifics.

Thanks,
Felix


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16517