[libcxx] r258292 - Use TEST_STD_VER instead of __has_feature to detect noexcept. This fixes the test with GCC.

[Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits]

Author: ericwf
Date: Tue Jan 19 23:44:11 2016
New Revision: 258292

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=258292&view=rev
Log:
Use TEST_STD_VER instead of __has_feature to detect noexcept. This fixes the test with GCC.

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/strings/iterators.exceptions.pass.cpp

Modified: libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/strings/iterators.exceptions.pass.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/strings/iterators.exceptions.pass.cpp?rev=258292&r1=258291&r2=258292&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/strings/iterators.exceptions.pass.cpp (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/strings/iterators.exceptions.pass.cpp Tue Jan 19 23:44:11 2016
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <vector>
 #include <initializer_list>
 
+#include "test_macros.h"
 #include "test_iterators.h"
 
 int main()
@@ -49,12 +50,12 @@ int main()
     static_assert((!std::__libcpp_string_gets_noexcept_iterator<random_access_iterator<char *> >::value), "");
     static_assert((!std::__libcpp_string_gets_noexcept_iterator<ThrowingIterator      <char *> >::value), "");
     
-#if __has_feature(cxx_noexcept)
+#if TEST_STD_VER >= 11
     static_assert(( std::__libcpp_string_gets_noexcept_iterator<NonThrowingIterator   <char *> >::value), "");
 #else
     static_assert((!std::__libcpp_string_gets_noexcept_iterator<NonThrowingIterator   <char *> >::value), "");
 #endif
-	
+
 //
 //  iterators from libc++'s containers
 //