[PATCH] D15914: [OpenCL] Pipe builtin functions
Anastasia Stulova via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 14 03:42:55 PST 2016
Anastasia added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp:1981
@@ +1980,3 @@
+ const char *Name =
+ (BuiltinID == Builtin::BIread_pipe) ? "read_pipe_2" : "write_pipe_2";
+ // Re-Creating the function type for this call, since the original type
----------------
pekka.jaaskelainen wrote:
> Shouldn't these have underscores, because they are not reserved OpenCL keywords/builtins? Cannot user functions be called read_pipe_2 or write_pipe_2?
Yes, definitely! Add prefix "__" to each generated name! I think this should be done for all of them!
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:291
@@ +290,3 @@
+ bool isValid = true;
+ // TODO: Now we check for all the pipe builtin with access qualifier, but in
+ // OpenCL spec does not tell about group functions, need to fix after get
----------------
Please, remove this TODO. Have you created the bug to Khronos already?
It seems sensible enough the access qualifiers must match. How can reserve/commit_read_pipe be called with a write_only pipe?
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:378
@@ +377,3 @@
+ S.Diag(Call->getLocStart(), diag::err_opencl_builtin_pipe_arg_num)
+ << getFunctionName(Call) << Call->getSourceRange();
+ return true;
----------------
I don't think we have any arguments there. It's all declared as variadic. But it seems to work without setting it. So I am not sure it's necessary to set it at all.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15914
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list