[PATCH] D15450: Avoid double deletion in Clang driver.
Serge Pavlov via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 11 09:50:54 PST 2016
Any feedback?
Thanks,
--Serge
2015-12-11 20:24 GMT+06:00 Serge Pavlov <sepavloff at gmail.com>:
> sepavloff created this revision.
> sepavloff added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
>
> Llvm module object is shared between CodeGenerator and BackendConsumer,
> in both classes it is stored as std::unique_ptr, which is not a good
> design solution and can cause double deletion error. Usually it does
> not occur because in BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit the
> ownership of CodeGenerator over the module is taken away. If however
> this method is not called, the module is deleted twice and compiler
> crashes.
>
> As the module owned by BackendConsumer is always the same as CodeGenerator
> has, local copy of llvm module can be removed from BackendGenerator.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15450
>
> Files:
> lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
>
> Index: lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
> +++ lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
> @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@
>
> std::unique_ptr<CodeGenerator> Gen;
>
> - std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module> TheModule;
> SmallVector<std::pair<unsigned, std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module>>, 4>
> LinkModules;
>
> @@ -97,7 +96,10 @@
> this->LinkModules.push_back(
> std::make_pair(I.first,
> std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module>(I.second)));
> }
> - std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module> takeModule() { return
> std::move(TheModule); }
> + llvm::Module *getModule() const { return Gen->GetModule(); }
> + std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module> takeModule() {
> + return std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module>(Gen->ReleaseModule());
> + }
> void releaseLinkModules() {
> for (auto &I : LinkModules)
> I.second.release();
> @@ -117,8 +119,6 @@
>
> Gen->Initialize(Ctx);
>
> - TheModule.reset(Gen->GetModule());
> -
> if (llvm::TimePassesIsEnabled)
> LLVMIRGeneration.stopTimer();
> }
> @@ -165,27 +165,14 @@
> }
>
> // Silently ignore if we weren't initialized for some reason.
> - if (!TheModule)
> - return;
> -
> - // Make sure IR generation is happy with the module. This is
> released by
> - // the module provider.
> - llvm::Module *M = Gen->ReleaseModule();
> - if (!M) {
> - // The module has been released by IR gen on failures, do not
> double
> - // free.
> - TheModule.release();
> + if (!getModule())
> return;
> - }
> -
> - assert(TheModule.get() == M &&
> - "Unexpected module change during IR generation");
>
> // Link LinkModule into this module if present, preserving its
> validity.
> for (auto &I : LinkModules) {
> unsigned LinkFlags = I.first;
> llvm::Module *LinkModule = I.second.get();
> - if (Linker::linkModules(*M, *LinkModule,
> + if (Linker::linkModules(*getModule(), *LinkModule,
> [=](const DiagnosticInfo &DI) {
> linkerDiagnosticHandler(DI, LinkModule,
> Diags);
> },
> @@ -195,7 +182,7 @@
>
> // Install an inline asm handler so that diagnostics get printed
> through
> // our diagnostics hooks.
> - LLVMContext &Ctx = TheModule->getContext();
> + LLVMContext &Ctx = getModule()->getContext();
> LLVMContext::InlineAsmDiagHandlerTy OldHandler =
> Ctx.getInlineAsmDiagnosticHandler();
> void *OldContext = Ctx.getInlineAsmDiagnosticContext();
> @@ -208,7 +195,7 @@
>
> EmitBackendOutput(Diags, CodeGenOpts, TargetOpts, LangOpts,
> C.getTargetInfo().getDataLayoutString(),
> - TheModule.get(), Action, AsmOutStream);
> + getModule(), Action, AsmOutStream);
>
> Ctx.setInlineAsmDiagnosticHandler(OldHandler, OldContext);
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20160111/bfb84fa1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list